Journal of Materials Science Research and Reviews

Optimization of Process Conditions for the Production of Biogas from Cow Dung

Okorie Onuora *

Department of Chemical Engineering, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu State, Nigeria.

Agu Mmesoma

Department of Chemical Engineering, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu State, Nigeria.

Udeh N. Stephen

Department of Chemical Engineering, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu State, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

---

Abstract

Biogas recovery from animal waste could be the key to unlocking the financial and environmental benefits of managing manure produced by livestock operations as well as organic waste from food processing sectors. There is no doubt that in the near future, the world’s energy supply market will be dominated by renewable and sustainable energy, since there is no alternative. While combustion is the most common method to gain energy from biomass such as wood and wood chips, the high content of water in animal slurry suits anaerobic digestion/fermentation for conversion to energy, in that direct combustion is not appropriate for most animal manures. However, biogas production is the technology that converts animal manure and other biomasses into viable fuel, recycling the carbon resource of animal slurry. This study critically evaluated the process conditions for biogas production yields from cow dung. The cow dung was pretreated and characterized, after which its proximate analysis were determined. Effects of process variables (cow dung/water ratio, catalyst dosage, and time) on the biogas yield were evaluated and optimized using the response surface methodology (RSM). The proximate analysis of the cow dung revealed that the moisture content falls within the acceptable limit of not more than 10% for long-term storage, an ash content of 5.52% was recorded; indicating a high mineral content of the cow dung sample and the volatile matter content value of 77.21% signifies the raw material suitability for biogas production. Furthermore, the results of the optimization of biogas production in this research work were found to have significance with the process parameters, thus, the optimum biogas yield of 51.97% was obtained at cow dung/water ratio of 0.46g/ml, catalyst dosage of 0.98g and time of 3days.

Keywords: Anaerobic digestion, bioenergy, cow dung, optimization

---

---

---

References

Okorie O, Edem UB, Edeh I, et al. Pretreatment of rubber tapping (heava brasiliensis) and achi mkpuru (gossweilerodendron balsamiferum) hardwood sawdust for bio-oil production: Drying and particle size characteristics at different temperatures. PTDF Journal. 2015;5(1):66-75.

Muthu D, Venkatasubramanian C, Ramakrishnan K, Sasidhar J. Production of biogas from wastes blended with cowdung for electricity generation- a case study. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2017;80:012055.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/80/1/012055

Raja IA, Wazir S. Biogas production: The fundamental processes. Universal Journal of Engineering Science. 2017;5(2):29-37. DOI: 10.13189/ujes.2017.050202

Obileke K, Makaka G, Nwokolo N. Efficient methane production from anaerobic digestion of cow dung: An optimization approach. Challenges. 2022;13:53. Available:https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13020053

Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Brand D, Mohan R, Roussos S. Biotechnological potential of coffee pulp and coffee husk for bioprocesses. J Biochem Eng. 2000;6:153–158. DOI: 10.1016/S1369-703X(00)00084-X

Simpson-Holley M, Higson A, Evans G. Bring on the biorefinery. J Chem Eng. 2007;163:46–59.

Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its utilization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14:919–937. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.006

Weiland P. Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:849–860.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7

Fantozzi F, Buratti C. Anaerobic digestion of mechanically treated OFMSW: Experimental data on biogas/methane production and residues characterization. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:8885–8892.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.077

Bacenetti J, Negri M.; Fiala M, González-García S. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process. Sci. Total Environ. 2013;463:541-551.

Alfa IM, Dahunsi SO, Iorhemen OT, Okafor CC, Ajayi SA. Comparative evaluation of biogas production from poultry droppings, cow dung and lemon grass. Bioresource Technology. 2014;157:270–277.

Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.108

Ismail ZZ, Talib AR. Recycled medical cotton industry waste as a source of biogas recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;112: 4413-4418.

Chuichulcherm S, Kasichan N, Srinophakun P, Saisriyoot M, Thanapimmetha A. The use of ozone in a continuous cyclical swing mode regeneration of FeEDTA for a clean biogas process from a swine farm waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2017;142:1267-1273.

Selvankumar T, Sudhakar C, Govindaraju M, Selvam K, Aroulmoji V, Sivakumar N, Govarthanan M. Process optimization of biogas energy production from cow dung with alkali pre-treated coffee pulp. Biotech. 2017;7(4):254.

DOI: 10.1007/s13205-017-0884-5

Situmbeko S. Decentralised energy systems and associated policy mechanisms - a review of Africa. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems. 2017; 7:98-116.

Dahunsi SO, Oranusi S, Efeovbokhan VE. Cleaner energy for cleaner production: Modeling and optimization of biogas generation from Carica papayas (pawpaw) fruit peels. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;156:19-29.

Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.042

Khayum N, Subramanian A, Sivalingam M. Biogas potential from spent tea waste: A laboratory scale investigation of co-digestion with cow manure. J. Energy. 2018;165.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.163

Benali M, Hamad T, Hamad Y. Experimental study of biogas production from cow dung as an alternative for fossil fuels. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems. 2019;9:91-97. DOI: 10.4236/jsbs.2019.93007

Iweka S, Owuama K, Chukwuneke J, Falowo A. Optimization of biogas yield from anaerobic co-digestion of corn chaff and cow dung digestate: RSM and Python approach. Heliyon. 2021;7:e08255.

Iweka C, Owuama K, Swift O. Influence of different inoculum concentrations on anaerobic digestion of corn chaff for energy production. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Engineering Adaptation and Policy Reforms; 2019.

Atelge MR, Krisa D, Kumar G, Eskicioglu C, Nguyen DD, Chang SW, Atabani AE, Al-Muhtaseb AH, Unalan S. Biogas production from organic waste: Recent progress and perspectives. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2020;11(3):1019-1040. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-00546-0

Grisel C, Umapada P, Surinam C. Enhanced biogas production from coffee pulp through deligninocellulosic photocatalytic pretreatment. Energy Science & Engineering. 2014;2(4):177-187.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.44

Croce S, Wei Q, D’Imporzano G, Dong R, Adani F. Anaerobic digestion of straw and corn stover: The effect of biological process optimization and pre-treatment on total bio-methane yield and energy performance. Biotechnology Advances. 2016;34(8):1289-1304

Yao Y, Bergeron AD, Davaritouchaee M. Methane recovery from anaerobic digestion of urea-pretreated wheat straw. Renewable Energy. 2018;115:139–148. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.038

Machunga-Disu LL, Machunga-Disu Z. Sustainable management of natural resources and the need for revenue transparency, subsidy reform and full deregulation: The transformation from fossil fuel to green energy, green deal Nigeria. A Publication of Heinrich Boll Stiftung, Nigeria; 2012. Access on 17/05/2012

Onwuliri FC, Onyimba IA, Nwaukwu IA. Generation of biogas from cow dung, J Bioremed Biodeg. 2013; S18(002):1-3.

Rojas C, Uhlenhut F, Schlaak M, Borchert A. Simulation des anaeroben prozesses-beider biogaser zeugung. ChemieIng-enieur Technik. 2011;83(3): 306–321. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cite.201000100

Cáceres GX, Cáceres RE, Hein D, Molina MG, Pia JM. Biogas production from grapepomace: Thermodynamic model of the process and dynamic model of the power. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012;37(13):1011-1017. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.178

Sujata, G. (2010): Cold climates no bar to biogas production. New Scientist, 208(2785): 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(10)62728-5

Sajeena Beevi B, Jose PP, Madhu G. Optimization of process parameters affecting biogas production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste via anaerobic digestion; 2014.

Sa'diah S, Putra MD. Biogas production from wastes of tofu industry with effects of water hyacinth and cow manure additions. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018;543:012097. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/543/1/012097

Park Y, Lek S. Artificial neural networks: Multilayer perceptron for ecological modeling. In Developments in Environmental Modeling. Elsevier. 2016;28:123-140.

Kana E, Oloke J, Lateef A, Adesiyan M. Modeling and optimization of biogas production on saw dust and other co-substrates using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Renewable Energy. 2012;46:276-281.

Ozor OC, Agah MV, Ogbu KI, Nnachi AU, Udu-ibiam OE, Agwu MM. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 2014;3:238. ISSN 2277 – 8616

Barasa, H.M. (2021): Optimization of biogas production using some process parameters in a fixed dome laboratory bioreactor. Egerton University Institutional Repository, p. 138. http://41.89.96.81:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2769

Ukpai PA, Nnabuchi MN. Comparative study of biogas production from cow dung, cow pea and cassava peeling using 45 liters biogas digester. Advances in Applied Science Research. 2012;3(3):1864-1869. ISSN: 0976-8610

Abubakar IK, Ibrahim A, Muhammad YY. Optimization of biogas production from cow dungusing response surface methodology. AJORIB. 2021;3(2):14-20.

Thuiller W. BIOMOD–optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biology. 2003;9(10):1353-1362.

Onukwuli OD, Omotioma M. Optimization of the inhibition efficiency of mango extract as corrosion inhibitor of mild steel in 1.0M H2SO4 using response surface methodology. Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy. 2016; 51(3):302–314.

Omotioma M, Okezue CF, Obiora-Okafo IA. Effect of bamboo (bambusoideae) leaf on the detoxification of cassava wastewater for potential biogas production. Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology. 2021;43(1):40-45.

Chozhavendhan S, Karthigadevi G, Bharathiraja B, Kumar RP, Abo LD, Venkatesa Prabhu S, Balachandar R, Jayakumar M. Current prognostic overview on the strategic exploitation of anaerobic digestion and digestate: A reviews. Environmental Research. 2023;216: 2(114526). Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114526

Meegoda JN, Li B, Patel K, Wang LB. A Review of the processes, parameters, and optimization of anaerobic digestion. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:22-24.